A story was released a few days ago saying that some scientists had proven with maths that it is impossible for halt aging.
Unfortunately, a lot of people are taking that at face value and think that it means that it is not possible to live forever. This is, fortunately, untrue.
It was “proven” in 2008 that humans couldn’t live past 125, and yet that was based purely on existing data and did not take into account our ability to solve issues.
The 125 limit is caused mostly by the Hayflick limit, which is a limit to how many times a somatic (normal – not stem) cell in the body can divide before its telomeres get too short, telomeres being the bits at the end of the DNA that stop the DNA from being corrupted.
Of course, once humans identify a cause to a problem, we get out there and solve it. So, Elizabeth Parrish, an entrepreneur that runs the biotech company BioViva, became the first human to undertake telomere extension therapy, adding up to 18 years to her life.
The mathematical proof that was released a few days ago relies on the natural chaotic warring that happens between the various cells in the body from running itself ragged. But again – if we can spot a problem, we can solve it.
The research assumes that a living being, once born, will continue to live as-is until it simply dies of old age.
But we are hackers. We tinker. We see problems and fix them.
One of the issues is senescent cells (SnCs). We have already come up with a number of solutions to that which will be publically available within the next few years, including senolytics such as FOXO4-DRI and UBX0101.
I don’t accept that it is mathematically impossible to live forever. I believe these scientists have simply not considered all the variables.